![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Myocardial re-vascularization is one of the fundamental steps in the clinical history of patients with coronary atherosclerotic disease. Solving the symptoms of angina, improving tolerance to effort, and a global gain in terms of reduced morbidity and mortality are the general goals that coronary re-vascularization has tried to achieve since its beginning. Coronary stenting is the most widely used non-surgical coronary revascularization procedure (537,000 interventional procedures in the USA in 2002) and completes the dilatation performed during angioplasty. Despite the use of newer and more sophisticated stents and drugeluting stents, the risk of long term re-stenosis arising from in-stent development of neointimal hyperplasia is high, varying between 4 and 40%. This high incidence justifies the use of diagnostic procedures to reevaluate the stent in follow-up examinations. (P.Pavone, et al, 2009). The surgical approach to coronary artery disease has evolved significantly over the past several years. The developments in this field have led to increased interest in the use of newer imaging procedures, before and after graft placement. (P.Pavone, et al, 2009) In addition , Patients with multivessel disease generally don’t become symptomatic until several bypasses are occluded. Nearly every third patient has an asymptomatic bypass occlusion or stenosis 5 years after CABG. ( Nikolaou K et al., 2006 ) Therefore; these patients need periodic assessment of the coronary arterial tree through a reliable method with high sensitivity and specificity. (Türkvatan A et al., 2009) Conventional coronary angiography is considered the reference standard for evaluation of coronary artery disease . however the risk of potentially serious adverse effects and the cost associated with such effects have led to search for noninvasive alternative. ( Sutton , 2003). 120 This makes finding a noninvasive method for assessment of these patient condition an urgent demand worldwide. Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) is now an established modality for noninvasive cardiac imaging. Advances in both the speed at which the X-ray source rotates and the number of detectors have improved the ability of CT to resolve smaller anatomic detail and have enabled imaging of the native coronary arterial tree (P.Pavone, et al, 2009). The 2 major recent advancements in multidetector CT technology are dual-source 64-slice CT and single-source 256- and 320-slice CT. Both of these techniques offer the possibility of reduced radiation dose compared with single-source 64-slice CT. Dual-source CT allows coronary CT angiography (CCTA) to be performed at higher heart rates. Another advantage is that if the data can be acquired in one heartbeat, phase misregistration artifacts arising from irregular heartbeats are not an issue. (Eugene C Lin et al, 2009) But , most of the literature reports refer only to the use of 64-row detector CT and there are, as yet, essentially no data available for higherlevel equipment (128, 256, 320 rows).(P.Pavone, et al, 2009) In conclusion , the accuracy of CT angiography to detect obstructive graft disease is almost 100%. Comprehensive post-bypass surgery evaluation should also include the assessment of the native coronary arteries, which may prove challenging as a result of advanced, diffuse coronary artery disease. .(Pim J de Feyter et al, 2008) In the presence of a chronic coronary atherosclerotic plaque, coronary CTA is a viable diagnostic option to detect the presence of coronary plaques (calcific and non-calcific) and to rule out significant stenosis and can provide information about the composition (calcific and non-calcific) of the plaque and then the success of a coronary angioplasty. (P.Pavone, et al, 2009) In addition , Multidetector CT is a useful mean for mapping the course of a left IMA graft before repeat surgery ,thereby minimizing the 121 risk of injury to the graft vessel during surgical reentry.(Frank J. R. et al, 2008) For stents , Current 16- and 64-slice CT technology allows reliable assessment of large-diameter (≥3 mm) coronary artery stents. Metalrelated artifacts preclude the correct evaluation of stents with smaller diameters. In parallel with new technical developments in MSCT technology, the preferable use of thin strut or low-density metal stents will further improve overall stent imaging. .(Pim J de Feyter et al, 2008) |