Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
التدابير التحفظيه التى تتخذها سلطه التحقيق والمحاكمه فى مواجهة المتهم /
المؤلف
شحاته، حسام محمد يوسف.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / حسام محمد يوسف شحاته
مشرف / احمد لطفى السيد
مناقش / حسن السيد حسن
مناقش / احمد لطفى السيد
الموضوع
التدابير التحفظيه. الحبس الاحتياطى. الارهابيين.
تاريخ النشر
2019.
عدد الصفحات
416 ص. ؛
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
Multidisciplinary تعددية التخصصات
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنصورة - كلية الحقوق - القانون الجنائي
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 424

from 424

المستخلص

This study on the provisional measures taken by the investigating and prosecuting authority before the accused dealt with the nature of the precautionary measures against persons and funds through their definition, the sources of their legitimacy and the characteristics that distinguish them from other similar measures in the preliminary stage. The study was divided into four sections, the first of which was entitled ”Temporary confinement or pre-trial detention.” The definition of the nature of detention, its nature, its justification, its limitations relating to the person of the accused, The second part of the list of terrorist entities and terrorists, ”and dealt with the definition and classification of the listing, and the constitutional and legal basis for listing terrorist entities and terrorists, and then the competent authority to request listing on these lists and those And the effects of publishing the listing decision on terrorist entities and terrorists. The third part dealt with the travel ban and the status on the access list, and explained how to regulate this right and the authority concerned with the prohibition of travel and the status on access lists, and then was subjected to judicial supervision of the travel ban and the constitutionality. The fourth chapter is entitled ”Prevention of Behavior”. This section has been divided into three chapters. The first chapter deals with the nature of the prohibition against the disposal of the defendant’s funds, whether such orders were taken by the Attorney General or the competent criminal court. The third chapter deals with the constitutionality of the prohibition against the conduct and the extent of its conflict or its agreement with the principle of criminal legality, the presumption of innocence, and the principle of personal punishment