الفهرس 
IntroductionOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 154 |  |  |
| | | from | 154 | | |
Abstract
This study included 203 women presented for cervical cancer screening.
All cases had recent cervical cytology test, regardless to its result, all participants were subjected to local examination, MHS cervical scanning, colposcopy, and cervical biopsy taken for histopathology.
MHS scan was “high” in 55.5 % in cases with ASCH, and 46.1 % of cases with HISIL. Also, it was found of high risk in 72.72% of abnormal colposcopic findings. With higher level of agreement between MHS and colposcopy than that with cytology.
Results of MHS cervical scan was compared to results of histopathology (considered as the gold standard for diagnosis of cervical dysplasia), MHS had a sensitivity of 88.63% for detection of any grade of dysplasia, with specificity of 67.94%.
For high grade lesions (CIN 2+), MHS cervical scan had a Sensitivity of 86.66 %, and specificity of 57.97%. Excluding the failed cases resulted in an increase of the sensitivity to 92.85%, and specificity to 58.6%.