الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Summary With the advances in science, there have been many treatment options for tooth extraction and immediate implant replacement, which have proven successful. And with the development of biomechanical concepts, an extraction tool called the physical forceps was developed, which relies on the extraction of teeth on physical laws, especially the first law of levers, forces, and vital properties of bones and teeth. This forceps consists of two arms, one of which is connected to what is called (the bumber), which acts as a fulcrum during the extraction process and is placed on the gum covering the alveolar bones in the front the tooth to be extracted, and the other arm is the head of the forceps (the beak) and is placed on the tooth in question, specifically in the gingival groove from the side of the tongue in the lower jaw or the roof of the mouth in the upper jaw, and by applying a simple circular force in the presence of the fulcrum, and with the passage of time, the maxillary bone surrounding the tooth expands, and this is one of its characteristics, and the extraction process takes place. Immediate implants are one of the most recent methods to compensate for teeth, and the success of immediate implants is measured by the amount of bone osseointegration occurring around them, as the chance of fusion increases whenever the inflammation and damage in the implant area after extraction is less. This study aims to evaluate the osseointegration around immediate implants after extraction with physical forceps and compare the outcome results with osseointegration around immediate implants after extraction with convintional forceps. Summary 72 The study includes sixteen cases with diseased teeth in the upper jaw of the premolars and anterior teeth that are not repairable and they do not have any diseases that interfere with performing the surgery. The cases were divided into two groups, each group consisting of eight cases, one of which is extracted using the physical forceps and the other with the convintional forceps. A clinical and radiological study was conducted before and immediately after the surgery and follow up after six month, the evaluation of bone formation was done by digital radiological images, using the (OnDemand 3D) computer program. The degree of stability of the dental implants was also measured immediately after the operation and after 6 month. The results of the study showed the superiority of the physical forceps in increasing the stability and bone density around the implant compared to the regular forceps. |