الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Unpredicatable amounts of irrigant fluid may be absorped during TURP. 1be volume of fluid may be large and the absorption may be insidious or rapid. The resultant expansion of intravascular volume and dilution of serum electrolytes may be life threatening. This study has been planned to evaluate the most suitable anaesthetic and fluid regimen for patients subjected for TURP. The associated changes in biochemical, haematological, haemodynamic and venous pressures parameters will be used for this evaluation. This study was conducted on thirty male patients subjected for elective TURP. They were randomally allocated into five equal groups each group consisted of six patients. The first group (ESVG) received epidural analgesia, 0.90/0 saline infusion, and pre-warmed (370C) distilled water glycine irrigation. The second group (ESG) received epidural analgesia, 0.9% saline infusion, and continuously warmed (37°C) glycine irrigation. The third group (ERG) received epidural analgesia, Ringer infusion, and continuously warmed (37°C) glycine irrigation. The fourth group (SSWG) received subarachcnoid analgesia, 0.9% saline infusion, and pre-warmed (37 OC) distilled water - glycine irrigation. The fiveth group (SRG) received subarachenoid analgesia, Ringer infusion, and continuo sly warmed (370C) glycine irrigation. |